$/transactional-email-api providers ↗
head to head

Amazon SES vs Mailgun

Raw infrastructure versus a developer-leaning managed sender.

Side by side

Feature Amazon SES Mailgun
Tagline Cheapest at scale, most setup work. Developer-leaning email infra, owned by Sinch.
Free tier 62,000/mo free if sent from EC2 (otherwise paid from email one) 100/day on Foundation trial
Starts at $0.10 per 1,000 emails $15/mo for 10,000 emails (Basic)
Pricing model pay-as-you-go tiered
API Yes Yes
SMTP Yes Yes
SDKs node, python, go, ruby, php, java, rust, dotnet node, python, go, ruby, php, java
Templates basic rich
React Email No No
Webhooks No Yes
Inbound Yes Yes
Multi-tenant No Yes
Idempotency No No
Dedicated IP Yes Yes
Deliverability Inherits AWS IP reputation. Generally good once warmed and configured, but the sender does the warming and complaint handling. Generally good, with deliverability monitoring tools available on higher tiers. Inbound routes and suppressions are battle-tested.
DX score 4/10 7/10
Best for High-volume senders with AWS infrastructure, cost-optimized workloads, and teams comfortable wiring SNS/Lambda/EventBridge for events. Technical teams that want SMTP relay plus advanced routing.

Amazon SES

pros
  • Cheapest cost per email, by a large margin at scale
  • Built for billions: handles the largest sender workloads in the world
  • Multi-region (us-east-1, us-west-2, eu-west-1, ap-south-1, and more) with regional reputation pools
  • Native integration with Lambda, SNS, SQS, EventBridge, and CloudWatch
  • Dedicated IPs and managed dedicated IP pools
  • VPC endpoints for sending from private networks
  • Inbound receiving with S3 and Lambda for fully serverless email pipelines
  • SDKs in every language AWS supports, from Rust to .NET
  • IAM-based authentication; no separate API keys to manage
cons
  • Sandbox mode requires manual approval before sending to non-verified recipients
  • No native webhooks; events route through SNS and you write your own glue
  • No dashboard for message-level debugging
  • Bounce and complaint handling is the senders responsibility
  • Templates are minimal
  • Operational overhead is real if you are not already on AWS

Mailgun

pros
  • Strong SMTP relay support, useful when migrating off self-hosted Postfix
  • Inbound routes with regex matching
  • Validation and parsing tools available
  • Sub-accounts for agency use cases
cons
  • Pricing changes in late 2025 hurt trust with long-time customers
  • Documentation is comprehensive but occasionally out of date
  • No idempotency keys
  • Sinch ownership has moved focus toward enterprise