$/transactional-email-api providers ↗
head to head

Warmy vs MailReach

Warmup trial and reputation workflow versus published per-mailbox pricing and bundled spam tests.

Side by side

Feature Warmy MailReach
Tagline Email warmup and deliverability monitoring for sender reputation. Email warmup plus spam testing for outbound teams.
Free tier 7-day trial, no credit card, 1 mailbox, 15 to 50 seed emails/day No permanent free plan published
Starts at Paid plan pricing is not exposed in accessible official pricing docs $19.50/mailbox/mo shown in the published pricing calculator
Pricing model tiered tiered
API No No
SMTP No No
SDKs None None
Templates none none
React Email No No
Webhooks No Yes
Inbound No No
Multi-tenant Yes Yes
Idempotency No No
Dedicated IP No No
Deliverability Not a sender. Warmup tools can create positive engagement signals, but they do not fix poor consent, bad lists, weak authentication, or irrelevant content. Not a sender. Helps monitor mailbox reputation, warmup behavior, blacklist status, SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and inbox placement test results.
DX score 6/10 7/10
Best for Outbound teams evaluating a warmup workflow before scaling sender accounts. B2B outbound teams that want warmup, spam testing, and reputation tracking in one product.

Warmy

pros
  • Official trial does not require a credit card
  • Trial includes the core warmup flow for one mailbox
  • Useful for testing whether a warmup workflow fits an outbound team
cons
  • Paid pricing was not visible in accessible official pricing docs
  • Warmup effectiveness is debated among deliverability practitioners
  • Does not replace authentication, list hygiene, or consent quality

MailReach

pros
  • Warmup and spam testing are bundled
  • Works with common mailbox and ESP setups that support SMTP
  • Includes domain and inbox health checks
  • Agency pricing path exists
cons
  • No permanent free plan is published
  • Per-mailbox pricing can scale quickly for outreach teams
  • Warmup does not fix poor targeting or bad list acquisition