$/transactional-email-api providers ↗
← all providers
Notifications founded 2021

Knock

Notification infrastructure with workflow engine.

overview

Knock is a workflow-based notification platform: define workflows in code or visually, route across channels (email, push, SMS, in-app), and let users manage preferences. Email is delivered via your provider of choice.

for teams choosing a transactional API

Judged purely as an API. What the request contract guarantees on retry, how complete the webhook event coverage is, whether suppressions are readable and writable programmatically, and how much the message log retains when something needs debugging in production.

Against high-frequency programmatic sends where a missed delivery is a product failure, Knock covers idempotency keys, webhook coverage, event stream, the suppressions API, batch sending, and SDK breadth, and does not cover operating track record. Whether that gap matters depends on how central those are to the build.

  • Idempotency keys: Yes
  • Webhooks: Yes
  • Event stream: Yes
  • Operating since: 2021
  • Suppressions API: Yes
  • Best published rate per 1,000: Tiers not published in comparable form
  • Batch sending: Yes
  • SDKs: node, python, go, ruby, php, elixir, java, dotnet
  • Deliverability: Inherits the deliverability of the provider you BYO (Postmark, SendGrid, Resend).
deliverability

Inherits the deliverability of the provider you BYO (Postmark, SendGrid, Resend).

best for

Teams that need multi-channel product notifications with preferences.

pros
  • Strong workflow engine
  • In-app feed component
  • Deep SDK coverage
  • Idempotency keys
cons
  • Pricier than running your own; entry plan is steep
  • Bring your own delivery provider

Features at a glance

API Yes
SMTP No
SDKs node, python, go, ruby, php, elixir, java, dotnet
Webhooks Yes
Templates rich
React Email Yes
Batch send Yes
Scheduled send Yes
Suppressions Yes
Multi-tenant Yes
Inbound parsing No
Event stream Yes
Idempotency keys Yes
Dedicated IP No

Appears in rankings

Compared with